CONCORDANCECanada’s public record, read
102located
25read
7424source-linked records
96.8%precision, on hand-read pages
72silent 1975
Municipal sewage reports
read from the scans
located, not yet read
dot size = surviving reports
ALL YEARS

What the reading found

Every claim keeps its page. What was refused is shown beside what passed.

Where the indexed record goes quiet

Where report series stop. A gap in the catalogue is not proof that reporting did.

Why that wording

These title-derived gaps are checked against broader collection activity to test for a collection-wide scanning cutoff; each individual cause remains unknown.

Whose effluent was in your water

Plants down each river, in the order the water reaches them.

How the order is derived

Each plant is tied to the nearest river gauge, then ordered by catchment area, which necessarily grows downstream. The towns sort themselves without any flow routing.

How accurate is this?

Measured against pages a person read by hand. Failures included.

Why publish the failures

An archive misread at scale is worse than one never read, because the errors look like findings.

Ask Jay

Answers only from the record. Every number carries its page.

What it will not do

It cannot answer from memory, and it will not describe a title-series gap without the collection-wide control and its limits.

Runs a local model. First answer takes a minute or two.